Skip to content
← The Scroll
Contemporary · Paper

AlphaFold and the End of the Protein Folding Problem

John Jumper et al. (DeepMind) · 2021

"For fifty years, going from a protein's amino-acid sequence to its three-dimensional shape took months or years of experiment per protein. In 2020 a neural network did it in minutes at near-experimental accuracy, and two years later the predicted structure of nearly every catalogued protein was free to download."

The idea

By 2020, after decades of X-ray crystallography, NMR and cryo-electron microscopy, biologists had determined the structures of roughly 100,000 unique proteins. Sequencing had by then catalogued billions. The gap existed because a protein's shape — the thing that decides what it does — is encoded in its sequence in a way nobody could compute: Christian Anfinsen showed in the 1960s that sequence alone determines the fold, and Cyrus Levinthal pointed out that a chain trying its conformations at random would take longer than the age of the universe to find the right one. At the 2020 CASP14 blind assessment, DeepMind's AlphaFold produced predictions competitive with experimental structures for a majority of targets, with a median accuracy score of 92.4 GDT. The organizers said the problem was, in essence, solved.

Why it works

The 2021 Nature paper describes a system that folds physical and biological priors into an attention-based network rather than simulating physics. Its input is not just the target sequence but a multiple sequence alignment of evolutionary relatives: residues that mutate together across species tend to touch in the folded structure, a signal the network learns to exploit. Two representations — one over the alignment, one over pairs of residues — exchange information through repeated attention blocks, then a structure module places every atom in 3D and the whole output is fed back through the network several times to refine itself. Every residue comes with a confidence score, so the model tells you where not to trust it. DeepMind open-sourced the code and, with EMBL-EBI, built a public database: by July 2022 it had grown from under a million predicted structures to more than 200 million, against about 190,000 experimentally solved structures in the Protein Data Bank, and had been used by more than half a million researchers. The 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry went to Demis Hassabis and John Jumper for the prediction work and to David Baker for computational protein design. The honest caveats still stand: a prediction is a single static shape, not the dynamics or complexes that biology runs on, and confidence drops on proteins with few evolutionary relatives.

The takeaway — recall it first
Check your understanding

What evolutionary signal does AlphaFold exploit when it takes a multiple sequence alignment as input?

Further reading

Read more about the topic

The explanation above is written with AI assistance. These are the originals — go to them to check it.

  • Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFoldNature 596, 583–589 (2021)
  • AlphaFold reveals the structure of the protein universe (DeepMind, 2022)Demis Hassabis / Google DeepMind
Up NextSuggested: Continues the theme of Frontiers of Cosmological & Technological Evolution

Prime Editing and the Reprogrammable Human Genome

"CRISPR 2.0 (Prime Editing) elevates genetic modification from a crude cutting tool to a precise word processor, unlocking the capability to cure most genetic diseases and propelling humanity into an era of directed, non-Darwinian evolution."

Science Time · Video EssayContinue→
Listen
0 / 12