Skip to content
← The Scroll
Contemporary · Philosophy

Epistemic Injustice

Miranda Fricker · 2007

"When we dismiss someone's testimony or ability to know something simply because of their race, gender, or social class, we commit a unique kind of violence against them."

The idea

Epistemic injustice occurs when a person is wronged specifically in their capacity as a 'knower.' It is the subtle, often unconscious bias that causes us to immediately doubt the credibility of certain groups of people.

Why it works

There are two main types. 'Testimonial injustice' is when a jury doesn't believe a witness because of his race, or a doctor ignores a woman's pain because he assumes she is being 'hysterical.' The person is speaking the truth, but prejudice deflates their credibility.

The takeaway — recall it first
Check your understanding

What is an example of 'Testimonial Injustice'?

Further reading

Read more about the topic

The explanation above is written with AI assistance. These are the originals — go to them to check it.

  • Epistemic InjusticeAeon
Up NextSuggested: Continues the theme of Social Constructs

Man's Most Dangerous Myth: The Fallacy of Race

"Race, as commonly understood, a set of discrete, biologically fixed categories that determine intelligence, character, or worth, has no basis in human genetics; the boundaries we draw between racial groups are social and historical constructions, not natural biological divisions."

Ashley Montagu · BookContinue→
Listen
0 / 5