Inattentional Blindness: The Invisible Gorilla
Daniel Simons & Christopher Chabris · 1999
"Attention is not a spotlight that dims the periphery; it is a gate. When you are focused on one task, a fully visible, unexpected event can pass through the middle of your visual field and never reach awareness — and you will be certain you would have seen it."
Two teams pass basketballs around; your job is to count the passes made by the team in white. Halfway through, a person in a full gorilla suit walks into the middle of the frame, faces the camera, thumps her chest, and walks off — about nine seconds on screen. Roughly half of the people counting passes never see the gorilla. Told about it and shown the tape again, many insist it must be a different video. Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris ran the study in 1999 under the title 'Gorillas in Our Midst'; the clip has since been watched tens of millions of times, and it still works on people who know something is coming.
The phenomenon is inattentional blindness, a term coined by Arien Mack and Irvin Rock the year before; Simons and Chabris' contribution was to show it lasted for seconds, in a dynamic natural scene, with an object nobody could call subtle. The design descends from Ulric Neisser's 1970s 'selective looking' films, in which a woman with an umbrella strolled through a ball game unnoticed. Two findings sharpen the picture. Observers were far more likely to notice the gorilla when they were counting passes by the black-shirted team than by the white — the unexpected object slips through more easily when it resembles what you have been told to ignore — and a harder counting task made it more likely to be missed. Spatial proximity did not help: the gorilla walked right through the attended region, which suggests attention selects objects and events, not places on the retina. The deeper lesson is the illusion of attention. We experience a rich, complete visual world and assume anything salient would announce itself; in fact we perceive and remember only what receives focused attention, and we badly overestimate how much that covers. Simons and colleagues later named the meta-error — overrating your own ability to detect change — change blindness blindness.
What did Simons and Chabris' gorilla experiment demonstrate about visual attention?
Read more about the topic
The explanation above is written with AI assistance. These are the originals — go to them to check it.
- Gorillas in Our Midst — inattentional blindnessSimons & Chabris / Wikipedia
- Selective attention test (the original gorilla video)Daniel Simons, YouTube
Predictive Processing
"Your brain does not passively receive reality through your eyes and ears. It hallucinates reality, and only uses your senses to correct its errors."