Skip to content
← The Scroll
Canonical · Essay

Play Long-Term Games with Long-Term People

Naval Ravikant · 2018

"The biggest gains in wealth, relationships, and reputation come from compounding — which requires playing long-term games (and being seen playing them honestly) with long-term people, since compounding only works if the game doesn't reset."

The idea

Naval's argument is that the biggest rewards in life — compounding wealth, deep relationships, a durable reputation — take a long time to build and can be destroyed quickly by a single act of short-term self-interest; the rational strategy, even if you only care about your own outcomes, is to consistently choose long-term games and long-term partners, since that's the only setting where compounding, rather than one-off zero-sum wins, is even possible.

Why it works

He frames this partly through iterated game theory: a single-round interaction rewards defection (take the short-term win, don't worry about the relationship), while a repeated, long-horizon interaction rewards honesty and reciprocity, because your reputation and the relationship itself become assets that compound. His related advice — 'no hard work,' 'specific knowledge over generic effort,' 'productize yourself' — all points toward building assets and relationships that keep paying out passively rather than requiring you to keep re-winning them.

The takeaway — recall it first
Check your understanding

What game-theoretic distinction does Naval use to explain why long-term games reward honesty?

Further reading

Read more about the topic

The explanation above is written with AI assistance. These are the originals — go to them to check it.

  • Naval's Thoughts On Playing Long-Term Games With Long-Term PeopleThe Acquirer's Multiple
  • How to Get Rich (Without Getting Lucky) — Naval's own podcast seriesNaval Ravikant & Nivi
Up NextSuggested: Explores related concepts like Compounding & Patience

The Surprising Power of the Long Game

"The 'long game' — small, boring, unglamorous daily investments that compound over years — reliably outperforms the 'short game' of chasing immediate, visible wins, because the long game's advantages accumulate invisibly until they become undeniable, while the short game's costs likewise compound until they become unavoidable."

Farnam Street (Shane Parrish) · EssayContinue→
Listen
0 / 3