Skip to content
← Home
Canonical · Essay

Utilitarianism

John Stuart Mill · 1863

"The right action is whichever produces the greatest net happiness for the greatest number of people affected — an act is judged entirely by its consequences, not by the intentions behind it or any rule it follows."

The idea

Mill's utilitarianism, building on Bentham's earlier, cruder version, judges morality purely by outcomes: an action is right in proportion to how much aggregate happiness it produces and wrong in proportion to how much unhappiness it produces, with everyone's happiness counted equally regardless of who they are. Mill's key refinement over Bentham was insisting pleasures differ in quality, not just quantity — intellectual and moral pleasures rank higher than purely physical ones, famously summarized as it being better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied.

Why it works
The takeaway — recall it first
Further reading

Read more about the topic

Up NextSuggested: Continues the theme of Philosophy & the Self

Meditations

"Peace of mind comes from rigorously separating what's in your control — your judgments, intentions, reactions — from what isn't — external events, other people, outcomes, even your own body — and directing all effort at the former while accepting the latter without resistance."

Marcus Aurelius · JournalContinue→
Listen
0 / 2