Skip to content

Skim

Negotiation & Persuasion · 20

Card 1 of 20: Getting to Yes

Canonical · Negotiation & Persuasion

Getting to Yes

Two Harvard negotiators noticed the same failure in labor talks, divorces, and hostage crises alike: both sides dig into positions and the deal dies. Their fix, published in 1981, became the negotiation standard.

Roger Fisher & William Ury · 1981 swipe · next
Canonical · Negotiation & Persuasion

Never Split the Difference

Chris Voss spent 24 years talking kidnappers into releasing hostages. His conclusion after leaving the FBI: 'splitting the difference' — the compromise everyone's taught to seek — is usually a bad deal for both sides.

Chris Voss · 2016
Canonical · Negotiation & Persuasion

Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion

Cialdini spent years undercover training as a used-car salesman, fundraiser, and telemarketer to catalog the tricks that actually work. In 1984 he distilled them into six weapons of influence that still explain most modern persuasion, from ads to cults.

Robert Cialdini · 1984
Canonical · Negotiation & Persuasion

Pre-Suasion

Thirty years after Influence, Cialdini asked a different question: what if the real leverage point isn't the pitch itself, but the seconds right before it? Pre-Suasion is his answer.

Robert Cialdini · 2016
Canonical · Negotiation & Persuasion

Bargaining for Advantage

A Wharton negotiation professor built his course around a finding students didn't expect: most people negotiate the same way in every situation, whether or not that style fits — and the fix is knowing your default before you walk in.

G. Richard Shell · 1999
Canonical · Negotiation & Persuasion

Start with No

Jim Camp trained Fortune 500 negotiating teams on a principle that inverts most sales advice: stop trying to get to yes. Let the other side say no, on purpose, as early as possible.

Jim Camp · 2002
Canonical · Negotiation & Persuasion

You Can Negotiate Anything

Herb Cohen negotiated hostage releases for the U.S. government and once said he treated every deal, personal or geopolitical, the same way — as a game with three moving parts he could learn to read.

Herb Cohen · 1980
Canonical · Negotiation & Persuasion

Crucial Conversations

Four researchers studied what separates people who navigate high-stakes, emotional conversations well from everyone else who either shuts down or blows up. The answer wasn't talent — it was a repeatable structure.

Kerry Patterson, Joseph Grenny, Ron McMillan & Al Switzler · 2002
Canonical · Negotiation & Persuasion

Difficult Conversations

Three members of the Harvard Negotiation Project noticed that couples, coworkers, and families all fought the same underlying fight, no matter the topic on the surface. They mapped it into three layers.

Douglas Stone, Bruce Patton & Sheila Heen · 1999
Canonical · Negotiation & Persuasion

Nonviolent Communication

A clinical psychologist who mediated in war zones and gang conflicts built a communication method on a simple bet: almost every accusation is a poorly worded, unmet need — and needs are far easier to negotiate than accusations.

Marshall Rosenberg · 2003