Skip to content
← Home
Canonical · Theory

Zero-Sum vs Positive-Sum Games

John von Neumann / Oskar Morgenstern · 1944

"Von Neumann distinguished zero-sum games — where one player's gain is exactly another's loss — from positive-sum games where mutually beneficial moves exist, arguing that misclassifying a positive-sum situation as zero-sum is one of the costliest strategic errors."

The idea

In 1944 von Neumann and Morgenstern formalized games where the chips on the table never change: poker hands, fixed-budget negotiations, and wars for territory are zero-sum; trade, innovation, and trust-building are not.

Why it works
The takeaway — recall it first
Further reading

Read more about the topic

Up NextSuggested: Continues the theme of Game Theory & Strategy

Repeated Games & Axelrod's Tournaments

"Axelrod invited game theorists to submit programs for iterated prisoner's dilemma and the simplest — Tit for Tat, cooperate first then copy the opponent — won, showing cooperation can evolve without central authority when the shadow of the future is long enough."

Robert Axelrod · BookContinue→
Listen
0 / 1